Archive for the ‘ Uncategorized ’ Category

Better than the House that Jack Built:

 Three days to go before 2012, and nobody knows what the future will bring. Who cares? Some will think that, and not give it another thought, but continue with the challenges of living. It could be a good way to be, especially if life is lived out well. Who cares, because we are cared for by a loving being; there is nothing to worry about. St. Paul uses the metaphor of building a house with our life: and we have the famous nursery rhyme in England that comes from the 16th Century: ‘The House That Jack built’ – not well built – but ‘Gerry-built, we say.

My instinct is to try to build something better and solid with life.

I care because as one gets older, the thought enters my head: how many more New Years will I see? There is a loving being who has a plan for me, for you, for each one of us. Cardinal Newman put it beautifully and realistically.

God has created me to do Him some definite service. He has committed some work to me which He has not committed to another. I have my mission. I may never know it in this life, but I shall be told it in the next. I am a link in a chain, a bond of connection between persons. He has not created me for naught. I shall do good; I shall do His work. I shall be an angel of peace, a preacher of truth in my own place, while not intending it if I do but keep His commandments. Therefore, I will trust Him, whatever I am, I can never be thrown away. If I am in sickness, my sickness may serve Him, in perplexity, my perplexity may serve Him. If I am in sorrow, my sorrow may serve Him. He does nothing in vain. He knows what He is about. He may take away my friends. He may throw me among strangers. He may make me feel desolate, make my spirits sink, hide my future from me. Still, He knows what He is about.

God has led me through my life to know Him. He has given me the gift of making choices that have led Him to be very real; and so it really is not difficult to have him in mind in all the events of everyday life. It is very easy however to forget him, especially when things are going easily for me, and there is the challenge of life.

Archbishop Patrick Kelly in his talks and letters points out many good things and one thing he underlines is in the Pope’s encyclical, “God is Love”.

We have come to believe in God’s love: in these words the Christian can express the fundamental decision of his life. Being Christian is not the result of an ethical choice or a lofty idea, but the encounter with an event, a person, which gives life a new horizon and a decisive direction. Saint John’s Gospel describes that event in these words: “God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should … have eternal life” (3:16).

The phrase, “being Christian is the encounter with an event, a person…” makes me realise that it is events of my everyday life that are really important. That is where we meet Jesus.

When the Word of God became flesh in Mary in Nazareth and was born a baby in Bethlehem it became much easier to see God in every day events than before. Our compassionate God understands and heals the weaknesses and sins of human beings. We are all chosen in the Word of God before creation began (Ephesians 1: 4). When Jesus taught that whatever we do to the least of his brothers and sisters we do to him (Matthew 25, 40) we can understand that every encounter with another is an encounter with Jesus. The Epistles teach us that all things, all events, all thought, all of life is held together in Christ Jesus (Colossians 1, 15-17). In other words in what happens to us we can meet and reflect on God who is all love, all mercy, all truth, all beauty, all knowledge and so forth. The invitation is to be led through the events of life, in union with God to fulfil the particular task that God wants. That is when, in the present moment, I can ‘hallow his name’: that is when I can forgive myself and others in His mercy, and so receive God’s mercy; that is when I can do good and do his work.

There may be a few more years for this blogger: there may not. But I want to live them well; the difficulty is to live continually in union with God. However each day there is the beautiful prayer that by good fortune monks and priests and sensible people say often: the Our Father: “Thy will be done” is one of the greatest phrases of all time. Let it be done in 2012 better and better, and if I slip a bit, give me the courage to get up and find that will again. Then may a very beautiful house be built, not ‘The House That Jack Built’!

In e-mailing the blog, ‘Word Press’ tends to distort the original formatting of the document. Readers may wish to visit the website www.stmarysblog.co.uk to read it in its original format.

Starting Again:

Christmas! The Word became flesh and lived among us and the world was never the same again. It happened in an obscure place of no political or religious importance, among the poorest and unknown of the time. Love incarnate, among human beings, changes everything, and could change for the better even the most difficult situations. Below is an example from the USA that might throw light on what I mean for numerous situations in our own communities today. The following article is composed of extracts from the diaries of members of a family.

Fr. Jonathan

The Holy Family by Juan Simon Gutierrez

Los Angeles, March 1993:

Peter:

I was twelve years married to Barbara. It was a marriage like many others, with its highs and lows, and all the usual routines – getting the kids ready for school in the morning, not having enough money to get through the month and so on. This was the reality and then there was work, which swallowed up more and more of my time. At a certain point Barbra and I no longer noticed each other and boredom began to creep in. And love? Well we seem to have lost that somewhere along the way. Yet it hadn’t always been like that. I remember the Marriage Preparation course we attended and the words of a Jesuit priest about love…. It felt like we were starting off on some great new adventure. Yet here we were slipping inexorably towards that big black hole where so many marriages end: separation. ‘Twelve years married, you’ve already been in this marriage too long’, said a colleague of mine cynically one day. The other night a conversation with Barbra turned into one awful row. Now everything is finished. But all I could think of afterwards was the terrified expressions on the children’s faces, especially Sophie’s, our ten year old, who is the eldest. She had a big sad ‘Why’ stamped all over her face.

Sophie:

Yesterday Mum and Dad were fighting more than usual. This morning Mum brought us to the babysitter. I think she wants to talk to Dad without having us around. I knew that they were thinking of breaking up. In my mind I remembered how it used to be before and I began to cry. Mum asked me what was wrong, and I said to her ‘Why don’t you give in. Why don’t you try to be the first in loving Dad?’

 Barbra:

As soon as I got home I rang Peter to finish things up. I just couldn’t put up with any more. But afterwards Sophie’s words were buzzing around in my head. My daughter had been the one to remind me that I had to be first in loving…. That phrase caused a deep disquiet in me and silenced my anger. I’ve always taught the kids to love each other and to compete in forgiving each other. When I used to see Sophie fighting with her little sister, I used to tell her to try to love Karen. Suddenly a thought came to me: my family was breaking up and I was doing nothing to save it. Up until now, I had been running away from the reality of our difficult situation. I didn’t even want to think about it. Now, thinking of Sophie’s word, my eyes filled with tears. My God, the thought of surrendering to Peter was unbearable.

Peter:

Like other days, I went to work as usual that morning, but I couldn’t concentrate at all, I was too agitated. Then I got Barbra’s call. She had decided to go back to Korea. She wanted to separate and she wanted to establish what we were going to do about the kids. So we had really reached the end. By now this was the reality of my family. O.K. if it was going to happen, let it happen, I was ready. Inside though, my heart was like ice. I remembered how much I had suffered when my own parents had separated for a long time, and the dramatic, unforeseen, economic problems we had. We all had to find somewhere else to live. It was hard to think that my own children were going to experience the same awful sadness that I had gone through. I felt alone, confused and depressed. Before going to the meeting with Barbra, I decided to stop in a church. I don’t know if I actually prayed. I just sat in front of a crucifix. Slowly a doubt began to form in my mind that maybe I could try to do something. Then again, maybe there was nothing more to be done. Barbra seemed very determined and she was not a woman to be swayed when she had made up her mind.

Barbra:

Before the meeting with Peter I stopped by at Rose, the babysitter’s house. I told the children to say a prayer so that during my discussion with Dad, something would change in our heart. I knew we needed a type of miracle. Sophie looked at me with a sense of relief, finding it difficult to keep back a smile. We hugged each other. At that moment I felt overcome by a serenity and a special strength. Thinking again of my relationship with Peter no longer gave me a sense of dismay.

Peter:

We met. Barbra broke the ice by asking me ‘Why don’t we try to start again?’ She had a new light in her eyes. Her proposal almost threw me, but immediately I answered: ‘Yes Barbra, it was my fault. Let’s start again.’ Therefore the talk we had after was not on the topics we had thought – custody, access and money arrangements. Instead it was a conversation full of sincerity and truth about the mistakes we had made, and our hopes for rebuilding our family. Our viewpoint was different. Suffering had freed our soul and love had been reawakened.

Sophie:

Mum and Dad arrived at Rose’s house while we were eating. They were holding hands and they had a box of cookies for us. Straight away we went home. It was the most beautiful day of our life.

Wishing you all a Very Happy Christmas and New Year.

In e-mailing the blog, ‘Word Press’ tends to distort the original formatting of the document. Readers may wish to visit the website www.stmarysblog.co.uk to read it in its original format.

Patience is a Virtue:

In the ‘old days’ one would often hear the exclamation: ‘Patience is a Virtue’, most often when things were not going according to plan.  I suppose, if one listens, carefully, to what is going on, even today, these words of wisdom can still be heard – but I would suggest not quite so often as, perhaps, decades ago.  

I think modern society has lost some of that art of waiting for that something special.  It may be that, years ago, economic circumstances forced on many that need to wait, simply because, before hire purchase and today’s credit cards, people had to save up in order to buy the things they needed.  This often involved quite long periods of enforced waiting, coupled with that certain delicious expectancy of the ‘big’ day. 

Patience is very much ‘mixed up’ with the aspect of time.   I say this, because, the passage of time exerts a strong influence on our ability to bear waiting, in order to obtain that which is very much in our hearts.

To the young, especially the very young, time seems to pass so very slowly, so that waiting even a week – and a week is forever! – for that special event, strains every nerve that we have.  To those more mature in years, time passes relatively much more quickly, and so we learn to be patient and wait for that special thing – that special time.  Well, that’s the theory!  Unfortunately, the theory often proves to be untrue, and so one cannot say that patience is much more easily to be found in the elderly – not with any certainty! 

Thinking back, I can still hear my mother – from the kitchen – shouting: “God knows, but you would try the patience of Job.”  It may be that few of us know much about many people mentioned in the Old Testament; however, I think it is likely that a fairly high proportion would know something about the story of Job – that he was a just and holy man who loved God, and who was well-favoured in his life by God.  He was rich, with a lovely home and a loving family of seven sons and three daughters.  In fact, he wanted for nothing, and for all this he gave thanks to his Creator. 

Now it seems that God was persuaded by Satan that Job could be brought to the situation where he would begin to curse God, if God would only allow Job to be stripped of everything that he had.  And so it came to be that Job lost everything – house, money, family – and on top of all that, he was made to suffer extreme physical torment.  Yet, at every stage of his ‘downfall’, Job still refused to turn against God.

Job – in the midst of all his troubles

Job’s ‘Comforters’, his three ‘friends’, Bildad, Zophar and Eliphaz, visited him in his affliction; they suggested he was getting what he deserved, maintaining that his misfortunes were sent by God as punishments for sin. With friends like this, who needs enemies! Job would not accept their arguments; he ‘stuck to his guns’ that God is a loving God, with an absolute love for all of us – each one of us.  In the midst of all his suffering, Job refused to condemn, or to curse, God, whom he loved and feared. The result of all this was that Job was rewarded by God for his patience.  His wealth, his house and his family were restored to him.

It is my contention that all of us can learn something from all of this. All too often, these days, people of all ages are far too impatient.  In the material sense, we just cannot wait for the things we want.  This means that we are not prepared to save and wait for what we consider to be essential to maintain, or improve, our standard of life.  What we want, we must have – and have it now.  The consequence of this is that we go into debt in order to buy whatever it is.  But, more than this – much more – is that the whole country gets itself into a state where virtually everyone is in debt, to the tune of billions of dollars, euros, pounds, etc. – and all of it simply because of the perceived necessity to live beyond our means, and contrary to what I call the first law of household economics – and all because of answering to our ‘greeds’, rather than our ‘needs’. 

In quite another sense, we can become impatient with God, not wishing to keep to His time-scale, but, very much, wanting to impose our own.  Why is it that we are always in such a rush?  We say our prayers and ask God to help us in this way or that – and what happens when we don’t get an instant answer?  We then become frustrated and accuse God of not listening – of not caring – or, in the words of Job’s Comforters, of paying us back for our sins.  But, then, there are always those who do not have any patience with God, or belief in God – never mind belief in his infinite goodness and love.

Shakespeare, as was his wont, came up with a very wry definition of patience:

‘He that will have a cake out of the wheat must tarry the grinding.’

(Troilus and Cressida (Act I, scene I))

But, there is a very fine definition of patience by Bishop Horne (1730 – 1792), Dean of Canterbury and later, Bishop of Norwich: 

‘Patience is the guardian of faith, the preserver of peace, the cherisher of love, the teacher of humility; Patience governs the flesh, strengthens the spirit, sweetens the temper, stifles anger, extinguishes envy, subdues pride; she bridles the tongue, refrains the hand, tramples upon temptations, endures persecutions, consummates martyrdom; Patience produces unity in the church, loyalty in the State, harmony in families and societies; she comforts the poor and moderates the rich; she makes us humble in prosperity, cheerful in adversity, unmoved by calumny and reproach; she teaches us to forgive those who have injured us, and to be the first in asking forgiveness of those whom we have injured; she delights the faithful, and invites the unbelieving; she adorns the woman, and approves the man; is loved in a child, praised in a young man, admired in an old man; she is beautiful in either sex and every age.’

Bishop Horne, makes the ‘jump’ from an ordinary definition of Patience to one that very much involves the religious idea of forbearance.  Patience was always a strong theme in Judaism, where the Talmud extols the virtue, and in the Hebrew Torah, there are several references to patience in Proverbs:  ‘The patient man shows much good sense’, (Proverbs 14), and, ‘A patient man is better than a warrior, and he who rules his temper than he who takes a city.’ (Proverbs 16:32). 

In Christianity, patience is thought of as one of the most valuable virtues of a good life, and is increasingly viewed as the work of the Spirit of God. References to the virtue are legion throughout the New Testament. Though not one of the three traditional Theological Virtues, nor one of the Cardinal Virtues, nevertheless it is one of the Seven Virtues – opposites of the Seven Deadly Sins – alongside chastity, temperance, charity, diligence, kindness, and humility. 

At the time of writing, we are all waiting for the great feast of Christmas – a time of waiting and preparation we call Advent – and all of us, young and old, should use this time wisely.  It is a time given to us – each and every one – to prepare ourselves for the coming of God, as God-made-Man, born to us, to live among us, to teach us God’s way, to suffer and to die for us.  We celebrate Christmas as the start to this whole process.  It is right, therefore, to treat it as one of the year’s great feasts – but with patience in the ‘build up’ – not trying to ‘jump-the-gun’ – and all the while making proper arrangements for the coming of Christ’s Birthday.  That’s the way it was meant to be – not scurrying through Advent in total impatience for the big day to arrive; and, not in scurrying round the shops buying up everything in sight, ready for the ‘Big Day’, whilst, at the same time, losing sight of its real meaning. 

John Ruskin wrote a lovely passage on the theme of time and patience; in this, I think he was trying to show us God’s way, rather than ours: 

‘Not without design does God write the music of our lives. Be it ours to learn the time, and not be discouraged at the rests. If we say sadly to ourselves, “There is no music in a rest,” let us not forget “there is the making of music in it.” The making of music is often a slow and painful process in this life. How patiently God works to teach us! How long He waits for us to learn the lesson!’  

Socius

In e-mailing the blog, ‘Word Press’ tends to distort the original formatting of the document.  Readers may wish to visit the website www.stmarysblog.co.uk to read it in its original format.

Love:

Some little time ago – in October of this year – I happened to switch TV channels only to come across the ‘Daily Mirror’s’, ‘Pride of Britain’ Awards, then being shown on ITV.  This type of programme, it must be said, is not usually my type of ‘watching’, but I stayed with it – and it was perhaps as well that I did, because, once one got away from the ‘hype’ and the ‘sugar-topping’, the programme contained something of very real value – something very much concerned with human behaviour – a person’s often selfless, brave and heroic conduct in the service of others.  In many cases, such acts were carried out at considerable risk to the ‘hero’s’ own safety.     fake watches

I recall one of the awards being given to a 6 years old child.  Suffering from an acute form of lymphatic cancer, he was prompted to start a charity to help other children suffering from similar forms of the disease, simply by raising money to buy better toys for them to play with, whilst they were detained on the ward.  His charity ‘grew’ and, apart from toys, funds are now being raised to provide for better equipment.   A grandfather ‘lost’ his grandson some 30 years ago to leukaemia.  Grieving, he began work to help other grandfathers – other grandchildren – giving of himself, selflessly, over all those years.  His charity ‘took off’ and has now realised over £100M; he still leads the campaign, despite having suffered from a form of cancer himself.  A young boy, 10 years of age, was instrumental in saving the life of his father; his father was attacked by a bull on his farm, at which the boy sounded the alarm, drove the farm tractor at the bull to protect his dad, thus saving his life, by putting his own life  ‘on the line’.  Then, there was the Pakistani father, who had just lost his son, murdered in the August riots in Birmingham.  The man stood his ground, and made a public appeal on TV for the rioting and violence to stop.  Commentators have said that his words were so powerful – so heart-searching – that they found their mark and people took notice; the rioting and violence did stop, from that moment on.  A grandmother used her handbag to ‘batter’ and chase away six armed robbers on motor-bikes; she thought they were mobbing a young boy, when in fact they were about to rob a jeweller’s shop.  A woman motorist came across a motorist stalled on a level crossing, when trains were coming from both directions.  At risk to herself, this lady, got the stranded woman out of her car, and then drove her car off the railway lines, just in time to prevent a freight train from crashing into the obstruction.  From the other direction a passenger train was coming and her actions saved the lives of many passengers on that train, in what could have been a major incident.  Then, of course, we, the viewers, were invited to applaud the heroic efforts of soldiers in Afghanistan, many of whom have risked lives and limbs to protect their fellow soldiers-in-arms.  Such heroics need no further explanation – just the sincere thanks of the Nation. 

The programme contained many more examples of self-less acts of bravery. It is not possible, here, to describe them all – but all of them were built, essentially, on conduct in the service of others.  It is true, also, that many such acts of service do not hit the headlines – or the Awards programmes – yet they, too, deserve commendation in equal degree.  And, in my view, there is another very important factor they all have in common; they are all built on LOVE. 

The love I speak of here is nothing to do with what we call love within marriage – though that is to be highly prized.  Nor has it to do with ‘falling’ in love and the many other aspects of what we often call romantic love. 

The love I am writing about is not easily defined though many attempts have been made over the long history of human behaviour.  Many writers have preferred to ‘rest on their laurels’ by defining what it is not.  Certainly, it is not to do with self and self-centredness, though that kind of self-love does exist for some.  Real love, within human relationships, does not ask for anything in return for the act of giving – and here, that last word of the phrase, provides the clue to its real meaning – for love – real love – is all about GIVING.  

In essence, it consists of “the gift of giving”, or of serving others, without the hope of reward or pay, the whole point being to try and improve that other person’s state of happiness and well-being. When one does the ‘right’ thing for others, one often receives something in return, but the gift of giving, in the first place, can never be influenced by possible reciprocity. Taken to the ultimate, of course, this gift of giving may, and often does, involve giving one’s life, in order to make that other person happy.  It is often said that, “Greater love hath no man than this; that he should lay down his life for his friend.”  The most valuable thing that can be given to another person is one’s own life. replica Rolex

Jesus contemplates his suffering and death – then gives his life for us 

Christ sacrificed his life, so that we might have life in us; similarly, when we express real love, we can give to others everything that is our life: our knowledge, interests, work, sadness, delight, possessions – anything that we are – anything that we have – everything that we are – everything that we have. 

Most of us will know of perhaps the best definition.  It comes from St. Paul’s First Letter to the Corinthians, Chapter 13: 

“If I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but do not have love, I have become a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal.  If I have the gift of prophecy, and know all mysteries and all knowledge; and if I have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing.  And if I give all my possessions to feed the poor, and if I surrender my body to be burned, but do not have love, it profits me nothing.  Love is patient, love is kind and is not jealous; love does not brag and is not arrogant, does not act unbecomingly; it does not seek its own, is not provoked, does not take into account a wrong suffered, does not rejoice in unrighteousness, but rejoices with the truth; bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.  Love never fails;  

St. Paul goes on to speak about other closely connected aspects and then concludes with the famous line: 

“But now faith, hope, love, abide these three; but the greatest of these is love. 

God loves all of us – every one – with his infinite love, and his love is absolute.  He made us to love him and to serve him – serve him by keeping his will, keeping his commandments, of which there are only two, effectively: that we should love him, (and no other ‘god’) – and that we should love each other, for his sake.  And if we love Him in this way, then our reward will be great in heaven.

 No Greater Love 

In John 15:12-13: we read:

This is my commandment, that ye love one another, as I have loved you….  And again: “…. greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.”  

Socius 

(In sending out this blog by e-mail, ‘Word Press’ distorts the original formatting of the document.  Readers are, therefore, advised to visit the website www.stmarysblog.co.uk should they wish to read it in its intended format). 

Hope:

 Father Jonathan’s blog of a week ago was on the subject of ‘Hope’.  Quite unwittingly, in a sense, he ‘hit the same note’, because what follows was on ‘stand-by’ in the blog ‘pipeline’.  However, this virtue really is worth the concentration of two different efforts – different in that they arrive at the subject from two quite separate standpoints – both emphasising the importance of HOPE in the world today.  Our world is one largely of negativity as regards God and all that He promises, therefore, largely in despair and woefully deficient in the blessings that HOPE can bring. 

In my quieter, more reflective moments at home, I often resort to a recording of Chopin’s 1st Piano Concerto, taken from an International Piano Competition, held at Leeds, a year or two ago.  The recording is of a young Italian pianist, Alessandro Taverna, and his playing of this famous concerto, in my view, was superb.  Just before he came onto the platform to play, there was a short introduction to the piece by one of the great pianists of our time, Christina Ortiz, and she describes Chopin’s mood, mental state, as he wrote one of the passages in the 1st movement, as desperate.  She says that Chopin was, at that point, very unhappy, having just fallen in love, in Warsaw.  Then just a little later, in the same movement, Christina, goes on to reflect on a similar piano passage, and here she says that Chopin’s attitude was one of “… I don’t know … one of blissful HOPE, happiness, I think … the genius of Chopin.” 

From this, it seems that Chopin’s mood, within a fairly short time-frame, had gone from crestfallen despair, that his love affair was failing, to one of hope that things would turn out ‘right in the end’, and, I think there is little doubt, that this change of mood is to be heard in the lyricism of the pianistic writing. So what, then, can we read into the meaning of this four-letter word…HOPE

I think, essentially that there are two aspects to this emotional state of mind … 1) that we have not yet achieved that which we would like to achieve … and 2) that with hope … we will achieve that happier state of mind, at some future time in our lives.  Hope seems to promote the belief in a positive outcome, to the events and circumstances in one’s life.  With ‘hope; we can look forward with confidence that ‘things will turn out for the better’, and in all of this, there are common feelings of future anticipation … future expectation … future desire … future happiness.  As Alexander Pope wrote: “Hope springs eternal in the human breast; Man never is, but always to be blest: …” (An Essay on Man).

An Allegory of Hope – Francesco Guardi (1747) 

That, I think, is hope in the ‘ordinary’ sense – in the ordinary use of the word.  But, to Christians, (and those of most other religions) there is undoubtedly, a much deeper meaning to this concept.  Within this context, it is very much tied up with that other important virtue … the virtue of FAITH … faith in the existence of a loving and merciful God, Our Father, who cares for us in an infinite and bountiful way … from which HOPE leads us to trust, unquestionably, in the promises He and His Son, have given us … and this hope, gives us that ‘reflection in the mirror’, showing us where we are today – then goes on to shows us that, with hope, there will be a favourable outcome to our lives, under God’s guidance.  It gives us confidence that, if we try to love God, and keep His word, He will be ‘there for us’ at the end, and that, really, there is no need for us to worry. Hope gives us a sense of ‘certainty’ and a ‘positive’ expectation of our reward in heaven – if we do what God expects of us – in our lives here on earth.  It is, of course, one of the three Theological Virtues, of Faith, Hope and Love, the greatest of these being love. 

Christina Ortiz describes Chopin, as desperate, at one point in his ‘love life’, and here, desperate – in a state of despair – is the operative word.  Despair – the total absence of hope – in ordinary life, would mean that, from a standpoint of unhappiness, negativity and unrewarding actions, there would be no enlightening horizon, no prospect of improvement, no chance of future betterment, no promise of future happiness.  Just think about this, and the prospect is one of a never-ending darkness, and, because such feelings are so often ones of self-rewarding, self-generating magnification, they would assume gigantic proportions, devolving thereto, into never-ending downward spiral and total nightmare.  But, then to apply the same reasoning to despair, as applied, in a theological way, this would inevitably lead to conclusions that denied the existence of God, God’s goodness, God’s mercy, God’s love and forgiveness.  What an awful outlook, that must be! 

Thank God, we are given the promise of a bright future – for God gave us his Son, to suffer and die for us on the Cross, to rise again on the third day and to enable us to rise with him, to be with him, one day, as He sits by His Father’s side in heaven.                 

From the writer C.S. Lewis, a non-believer who later became a devout Catholic, the following extracts may help us to understand a little more: 

“ … If I find in myself a desire which no experience in this world can satisfy, the most probable explanation is that I was made for another world.  … If none of my earthly pleasures satisfy it, that does not prove that the universe is a fraud. Probably earthly pleasures were never meant to satisfy it, but only … to suggest the real thing. If that is so, I must take care, on the one hand, never to despise, or be unthankful for, these earthly blessings, and on the other, never to mistake them for the something else of which they are only a kind of copy, echo, or mirage. … I must keep alive in myself the desire for my true country, which I shall not find till after death; I must never let it get snowed under or turned aside; I must make it the main object of life to press on to the other country and to help others do the same.” 

In this passage, he speaks clearly of earthly hope and hope in the divine.  He also warns of the dangers of false hope – hopes that have their beginnings, and endings, in all that is temporal.  May God grant that we should always have hope – hope that is both temporal and spiritual.  And, again here, whilst the former is laudable, the accent must be on the latter, for what we are fundamentally concerned with is hope for that better life, that life with God. 

I remember, well, the words of advice Father Wilfrid McKenzie O.S.B. often used to give, years ago: “Keep trying – never give up hope.” They are words of good advice, and profound in many ways – for they are words that are reflected in the following passages from the Bible, encouraging us to always persevere: 

  • “And indeed everything that was written long ago in the scriptures was meant to teach us something about hope; from the examples scripture gives of how people who did not give up were helped by God.” (Rom 15:4) 
  • “Let us not become weary in doing good, for at the proper time we will reap a harvest if we do not give up.” (Gal 6:9)  
  • “Let your hope keep you joyful, be patient in your troubles, and pray at all times.” (Rom 12:12) 
  • “May our Lord Jesus Christ himself and God our Father (who has loved us and given us un-ending encouragement and unfailing hope by his grace) inspire you with courage and confidence in every good thing you say or do.” (2 Thes 2:16-17) 

Perhaps, the final word can be left with St. Peter; in his first letter, he wrote: “Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, which according to his abundant mercy hath begotten us again unto a lively hope by the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, to an inheritance incorruptible, and undefiled, and that fadeth not away, reserved in heaven for you.”  (1 Peter 1, 3-4).

Socius

In e-mailing the blog, ‘Word Press’ tends to distort the original formatting of the document.  Readers may wish to visit the website www.stmarysblog.co.uk to read it in its original format.

 

Hope Springs Eternal:

When I travel in the car, I find it a very good time to turn off all radios and CD’s, and just allow time for my fairly tired brain to relax and think. That does not mean, however, that I am other than very focussed on the dangers of driving, as the older I get, the more I am aware that a car is also a lethal weapon of destruction. But then I do, sometimes, listen to both the radio and CD’s. I have a favourite CD of short sayings, from the writings of Chiara Lubich, and one of these has stayed with me, in a profound way:

What good would it do Him to be infinitely merciful? What good would it do Him, if it were not for our sins? 

After hearing that for perhaps the tenth time, I turned off everything again, and let it sink in. 

Tomorrow, 11th November, is Armistice Day. We will be holding the Remembrance Day Service for the Borough Council, in our Church, on Sunday at 11.45, and I am to preach. It will be a short sermon, and this saying of Chiara’s, will be the inspiration. She says to me that God’s Love ‘bends over backwards’, in Jesus, to give us hope – for Jesus longs to take away the sufferings that human beings cause themselves.

The slaughter, that best describes the First World War, was mindless and unnecessary: yet God permitted it. Why?

A Photograph of the First World War That Needs No Explanation

The slaughter and torture of all since – right up to the present – is also mindless, and yet God permits it. Why? We have to bear in mind that the ‘sins’ that God permits are, also, in that sense, ‘God’s Will’. The greatest ‘sin’ in the history of the world was, and is, the Passion and Crucifixion of Our Lord, and that ‘permitted evil’ led to the fullness of the Redemption, in the Resurrection of Jesus from the Dead. Jesus ‘spoke’ not only in words – but in his deeds. The Cross was the perfect expression of the Love that God is, and from utter nothingness – God, dead on the Cross – arises the fullness of life. 

What good would it do Him to be infinitely merciful? What good would it do Him, if it were not for our sins? 

God seems to be calling for us to give him the sins we commit, so that He can justify his own Death on the Cross. 

Why do we have the beautiful international saying: ‘Hope springs eternal’? It must come from that unknown part of the self that is deep within our spirit: it is there, that we find the Wisdom that is God. Even in the worst disorder, destruction, hatred and chaos, beauty can spring up. It is part of our human experience. The poppy is the beautiful symbol that ‘springs’ up, out of the muddy, awful waste-land of First World War trenches.  God who is all beauty, joy, happiness, life and glory is not destroyed by any darkness – for: 

“The light shines in the darkness and the darkness did not overcome it”. (John 1:5) 

At this point, I will conclude my blog, by quoting a small section of a book entitled, “Your Word is Fire”, a title that goes to the heart of my present meditations. The book is much more meaningful to me, because I know the author quite well: on one occasion we holidayed for two weeks, together, in Ireland. He is an Italian missionary and theologian, a priest called Fr. Fabio Ciardi, O.M.I. He explains, using the ‘Fathers of the Church’ to back his writing, how Jesus speaks to us – but not just in his words; his very life speaks to us, also.  In the end, ‘Hope Springs Eternal’, because Jesus is God-With-Us. 

Why did what Jesus say enchant the crowds? Why have his words been the inspiration of generations of Christians, sustained the Martyrs in their sufferings, formed saints, sustained missionaries..? Because, in his words, he gives himself. He speaks who he is. His life speaks. 

St. Gregory the Great (died 604 AD; he sent St. Augustine to England) is the spokesperson of the tradition that sees in the sacred books a message that God has sent to all humankind. “What is Holy Scripture – he asks – if not a letter from almighty God to all his creation?” In Holy Scripture he lets us take note of his will, reveals his plan of salvation, his thoughts of peace; and he shows in practical terms the way a person can conduct his or her life. Having said that, Holy Scripture is something more than a message from God. It is true that it contains his Word, but when God speaks he does not say words, he says himself. St. Augustine of Hippo (died 330 AD) reminds us that God never gives less than himself. 

The unique Word that the Father, from eternity, pronounces is the Word, his Son. It is a unique Word that completely and finally expresses himself: he gives all himself. He is not like us because, when we express ourselves, we need many words and concepts…and even then we find that we have not managed fully to say what we mean. St. Augustine (of Hippo) says something else that in the Word that the Father has said everything in an ineffable way, (not to be spoken because of its sacredness; unutterable: the ineffable name of the deity.) 

A woman can give birth to many children because to each one she gives her life, but not the whole of her life….she is there also to give birth to others. The Father is not like that. He cannot generate more children because when he generates his only Son, his favoured one, he gives the whole of himself fully and completely and makes him another He: God from God, Light from Light. The Father cannot say another word. “All that God the Father has given to God the Son – writes St. Augustine (of Hippo) – he has given in generating him…How in any other manner can he give words to the Word in whom in an ineffable way the Father has said everything?” 

Perhaps we can begin to intuit with our hearts why ‘Hope Springs Eternal’.  Our God is madly in Love with each one of us, and all of us together, and in every circumstance of life.

(Unfortunately, in sending out this blog by e-mail, ‘Word Press’ distorts the original formatting of the document.  Readers are, therefore, advised to visit the website www.stmarysblog.co.uk should they wish to read it in its intended format).

 

Follow Me (Mt. 9:9):

If somebody had no idea in which direction to go, then you might help them and say: “Follow me”, if you were sure of the way. You might advise people in a car to ‘follow me’ if you needed to get somewhere, together, and you knew the way, and the other did not. But, to do what Jesus asked, in the sense of giving up ‘everything’, to follow him with your life, is quite another thing altogether. It is quite alien to my experience, that anyone would use those words, in that sense.

It is true that the founders of Religious Orders, St. Francis of Assisi, St. Teresa of Avila, St. Benedict, St. Bridget of Sweden, St. Ignatius and others, all had companions and followers. For that matter, similar followings happen in our own life-time; Mother Teresa of Calcutta and Chiara Lubich also had many companions who followed the example of these ‘leaders’ on their way to God. However, in all these situations, one is not, necessarily, following the particular founder of a Religious Group; rather, he or she is following God, or Jesus, in the ‘spirit’ of the person who founded that special group. The ‘following’ would be the result of seeing the life-style of the person whose life was already answering a call from God, then being attracted by him, or her, or their companions; normally, there would be time to discern, and talk, about the response to the inner-call that one felt.  There would be conversation about the feelings in one’s heart, in discerning – in deciding – what to do.

In my own case, I am sure that what attracted me to make the ‘big’ decision to follow God, as a monk, was the result of my own uncertainties about life, coupled with the life-style, and the types of person exemplified by many of the monks to be found at Ampleforth, in the 1960’s, whom I admired and respected. Then, there was the knowledge that, taking this path would be a worth-while venture. Later on, and after already being a monk, that initial response would be increasingly purified, through circumstances of life, until bit-by-bit, the response to the call of God was not based on negatives, alone, but on that indescribable ‘something else’ that is to do with God himself.

Who would dare to say ‘follow me’, and ask another to change his, or her, whole life-style except the ‘leader’ who could be quite sure, that he, or she, was offering the follower something better, than the way of life they were already living – already experiencing?  It’s a ‘BIG’ ask, and only somebody that knew us, through and through, could ‘dish-out’ the invitation; only somebody capable of sharing, capable of giving what was needed in life, would dare to do it. The Word of God, through whom all things are made, who chose us, in Him, before Creation began, and who is LOVE, itself, and who gave himself for us on the Cross, out of Love, provides us with the answer.

Jesus calls people to ‘follow Him’ throughout history, again and again, each day. It may not be in a ‘life-changing’ way, but more often, in small things. For instance, he is calling me, through particular circumstances, to go and visit somebody who needs that contact. He may call me to be generous with my time. He may be calling me to answer the telephone, and be kind to a person who wants me.

The other day on my ‘rest day’, I was in the Liverpool City Centre calling at St. Paul’s Bookshop, from where I had ordered the ‘new’ Missal. Walking with a friend through the pedestrian area, we came across the people selling the ‘Big Issue’, mainly poor people, and usually from overseas. The first person was a bit ‘pushy’ and, for some reason that I later regretted, I did not respond to him, except to say: “Another time”.  A little later, in Bold Street, I saw another ‘seller’ man, standing rather quietly and diffidently. The thought had already ‘crossed my mind’ that I should be more generous to homeless people – and so I ought to have been so to the ‘pushy’ chap; at this, I approached this ‘quiet man’ and gave him the £2, asking him from where he came? He smiled, shyly, and said: “Romania”.  This marked such a great moment of joy for me; I hope the seller, too, felt some joy in receiving the donation.

Sellers of the ‘Big Issue’ are most often from foreign lands, ‘disadvantaged’ by ethnicity, homelessness, poverty, unemployment….

I wonder why it is that people do not follow Jesus very much in today’s world. Why do people not follow him, into a life within the Church, in particular?  Here, I am not, necessarily, referring to a ‘vocation’ as a priest, or a religious, or one dedicated to God, but rather, to worshipping God regularly in Church?

It occurs to me to wonder, whether the practical reasons, at least for those working, or those with children, is that life is often so full and so busy, that there is little time left for worshipping God. Some people, who do worship God, state that they can identify with this analysis. In the view of many, there is always that some ‘more important thing’ to do, like finish off that job, prepare for a GCSE exam, go to a dance class, play football; perhaps it is just a much-needed rest during the week-end, after a week of work-exhaustion.  I am sure that there are other deeper problems, too – indifference, that ‘no-need-of-God’ –  that uncertainty about what is right and wrong – that ‘comfort-zone’ feeling of having enough money / resources to live a fairly comfortable life, without anything much to disturb it. All these result in many not having a real personal relationship with God that is meaningful.

A German journalist, Peter Seewald, recently, took part in a long conversation with Pope Benedict XVI, about issues connected with these questions; the results have been published as a book, entitled ‘Benedict XVI, Light of the World’. He put a long question to the Pope which might be shortened in this way: 

“Holy Father, society’s problems are not improving and this underlines all the more the urgency of the questions that shape our lives. What are our values and standards? What are we actually doing with our lives? How do we want to live them in the future? We see in our time a world in danger of sliding into an abyss. We see unrestrained economic systems which devours values on a large scale. Society plunges ahead restlessly with no clear sense of direction, and today we consider wrong what yesterday we considered right, and tomorrow we regard as right what today we regard as wrong. 

There is burnout, new addictions like internet games or pornography. We have unmanageable work related stress. We find children who suffer on account of the loss of family relations. The media dominates and tries to break our taboos, dumbing us down and blunting our moral sense. We have electronic media which has the potential to manipulate and destroy the qualities that make us human. 

The Church has contributed greatly to the development of civilisation. Today there is an attitude of contempt for the Christian religion, and increasingly hostility to Christianity in many countries. What has happened?” 

The Pope’s answer is interesting and may be a light for some of us. A summary follows:

“First of all the development of the modern idea of progress and science has created a mentality that we think will make God ‘superfluous’. Today, people think that they, themselves, can do everything that they once awaited from God alone. In light of this scientific and intellectual way of thinking, matters of faith appear as old fashioned, a myth, or belonging to a bygone civilisation. Religion, or at least the Christian religion, is accordingly classified as a relic of the past.

 People in the eighteenth century during the Enlightenment were announcing that the Pope was inevitably doomed to disappear one day.

The Enlightenment, it was thought, would finally sweep away these age old myths, once and for all.There is a sense that, for many, things are not ‘quite right’ with our world; people worry about the future, and there appears to be no satisfactory answer to these feelings.  Yet, to the discerning, there is an answer: “Follow me”, said Jesus, the Word of God.

Jean-François Millet (1814-1875) – The Angelus  – (Workers in the fields stop work to say the prayer in honour of Our Lady) 

I have found that, stopping ‘everything’ for the ‘Angelus’ when I hear the bell at 12 noon and at 6.00 pm, is always something difficult to do. Are there not always things to be getting on with? Yet, when I turn away from the negatives, and towards those few precious seconds thinking of the Annunciation-cum-Incarnation, I always feel the positive benefit of that change of mind, and that thing that ‘could not be left’ is never damaged by those few moments in prayer.  ‘Follow Him’ and we can learn, day-by-day, in union with Him.

In e-mailing the blog, ‘Word Press’ tends to distort the original formatting of the document.  Readers may wish to visit the website www.stmarysblog.co.uk to read it in its original format.

 

The Heart of the Gospel:

The Pharisees of Jesus’ days were those who kept the law, and were rightly known as the ‘pious’ Jews. It is probable that Joseph and Mary, Zechariah and Elizabeth, Simeon and the widow, Anna, and of course many other pious Jews would have been associated with this group. I have heard the comparison with today’s Catholics who come quite often to weekday Mass, many of them on a daily basis.

Picture of a man at prayer

They were good people, and Jesus, himself, may have been involved in that group. Certainly he was used to visiting the synagogue, in Nazareth, for Luke, the Evangelist, wrote that Jesus was accustomed to be in the synagogue each Sabbath (Lk 4: 16). In Matthew’s Gospel, there is a fascinating sentence that opens up a huge vision about the ‘heart’ of the teaching of Jesus, in the Gospel. It goes like this:

When the Pharisees heard that Jesus had silenced the Sadducees, they gathered together, and one of them, a lawyer, asked him a question to test him. ‘Teacher, which commandment in the law is the greatest?’ He said to them, ‘“You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind.” This is the greatest and first commandment. And a second is like it: “You shall love your neighbour as yourself.” On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.’ (Mt. 22: 34-40)

The Pharisees and the Sadducees

The first little phrase does hint at the Pharisees being rather pleased that Jesus had silenced their rivals, the Sadducees. Interestingly enough, the Sadducees were like the upper classes in the Jewish Society, and Jesus, son of a carpenter / builder would be, in our terms, a working man. In England, the working man is mostly regarded as having a ‘provincial’ accent, whilst those of the English ‘nobility’ most often speak with an ‘upper-class’ accent that is hard to define; invariably, it is given the accolade of an ‘Oxford’ accent – an accent that is universally accepted as markedly different from those of the provincial accents, found throughout the length and breadth of island Britain.

I doubt if things were precisely like that in the Palestine of Jesus’ day, but the comparison may help us with an insight, into the kind of ‘class’ divisions that Jesus faced, in his own day. The fact remains that Jesus had silenced the Sadducees, who were chiefly among the priests of the temple in Jerusalem, in charge of administration of their country; they organised the collection of taxes, equipped the army and were responsible for official Jewish relationships with the Roman rulers and occupiers.

Those Sadducees must have been ‘galled’ that they had lost the argument with Jesus – a man from a much lower social level. At the same time, the ordinary people followed Jesus, a man, whom, they realised, was genuine and authentic, unlike these ‘leaders’ of the Jewish people. It is a sad fact that, even today, most ordinary people in our country are not too trusting of the leaders in politics, banking, sport, fashion, commerce – even, at times, in the Church – despite the high and noble calling it is to be a leader, in different spheres of the country’s life. When one comes to think about it, nothing much changes – there’s nothing much new under the sun!

Then the Pharisees ‘gathered together’ and I can imagine them in a little ‘huddle’, rejoicing in the discomfort of the Sadducees and so it became their turn to think out a question to ‘test’ Jesus. They were those who represented the pure Jewish religion: by comparison today’s parallel might be with those who regard themselves as ‘sticklers’ for what are the Church rules – rules that are never bent to accommodate the needs of the people, despite those needs becoming desperate at times. It could be the rather harsh ‘tut-tutting’ in Church, these days, when a harassed mother is trying to control her young child, who is making a noise, and the ‘good’ Christians are a bit ‘put-out’.

There is a wonderful example, given in the Gospel, of the lady who for eighteen years, had been bent double, virtually crippled. Jesus saw her and called her over to him; then, quite simply, he said to her: “Woman, you are set free from your ailment.”

 The Lady Doubled-up in Pain

When he laid his hands on her, she stood up straight, immediately, and began praising God. Well, no wonder that lady gave praise to God, as eighteen years of misery was taken away from her by Jesus”

At this point, we are introduced to the leader of the synagogue, who would have been a Pharisee with a mission for ritual purity, and perfection in the ‘law’. He was angry with Jesus because Jesus he had cured on the Sabbath, and he spoke to the crowd that surrounded Jesus: “There are six days on which work ought to be done; come on those days and be cured and not on the Sabbath day”. Jesus’ reply, in perfect charity, went straight to the point: “You hypocrites! Does not each of you on the Sabbath untie his ox or his donkey from the manger, and lead it away to give it water? And ought not this woman, a daughter of Abraham, whom Satan bound for eighteen long years be set free from this bondage on the Sabbath day?” The crowds rejoiced at Jesus, and all his opponents were put to shame. (Luke 13, 10-17).

How much more wonderful, it is, when somebody has had something on their conscience for years, and years, often becoming a burden too heavy to bear, and then, at last, it is removed by God’s power, in the Sacrament of Reconciliation. That great joy has been mine to give out on various occasions. One man I knew, from Bamber Bridge, had been burdened for over 40 years, as I remember; soon after his release from his own sense of unworthiness, before God, he died and went to his eternal reward.

Man – in Freedom

The heart of the Gospel of Jesus is to love God totally, (in Latin, ‘totus tuus’ – completely yours), and your neighbour, as yourself. What all this implies would be the subject of another blog, but of one thing we can be certain – it is freedom from being ‘shackled’ by fear and scrupulosity, giving each man, and each woman, the chance to hold his, or her head, up high, in that sure and self-confident knowledge of utter dependence on God, and his love, in company with others who belong to the same family of God.

Woman – in Freedom

 To put things in a ‘nutshell’, the heart of the Gospel is ‘LOVE’

In e-mailing the blog, ‘Word Press’ tends to distort the original formatting of the document.  Readers may wish to visit the website www.stmarysblog.co.uk to read it in its original format.

 

FAITH:

Fr. Jonathan is away on retreat and has seen this blog. He writes:

“Reading the scriptures there seem to be different stages in the journey of faith. At some point, like Mary Magdalene in the Garden of the Resurrection, we actually meet Jesus, and so our faith is not just a ‘blind’ belief, but rather is personal knowledge of God and his love. To reach this stage, requires the good-will to be open to God, his love and mercy. Peter and John ran to the tomb, after Mary Magdalene told them news, the stone had gone. Peter went in to the tomb, and it does not say he believed; perhaps, he was too self-preoccupied, after his betrayal of Jesus. John went in second; he did believe, perhaps because he remained with Jesus, and his mother, at the Cross, and Jesus had said to him from the Cross: ‘Behold your mother’. He was at that stage more open.  Later on they all saw the risen Jesus. We, ourselves, meet him through the different circumstances of life. Yet our faith, even if it is ‘knowledge’, always needs nurturing, and may even disappear if we do not practice it. Pope Benedict, aware that faith is a challenge in our culture, has called for a year dedicated to faith, from October 2012 to November 2013. Let us ask the Lord, as this blog says, to strengthen our weak faith”.  

Fr. Jonathan.

What a perfectly lovely gift it is to have faith – ‘faith that can move mountains’.  Well, it may be that not all of us are so strongly gifted, but, faith enough to believe in the existence of an Omnipotent and Supreme Being – God our Father – who created heaven and earth, all things visible and invisible, who made us in his own image and likeness, to serve him in this life and to be happy with him for ever in the next – well that is quite enough to be going on with, I think. 

A week ago, Father Jonathan included in his blog concerning Martin Kevill, the subject’s own line: 

“My only hope is that if there is a God living up there in Heaven –

He’ll understand that at least I tried.” 

I think a line like that – built on a life of ‘trying’ is enough to get one through ‘St. Peter’s Gates’, but Martin was, at the same time, being honest and expressing some of the doubts he had felt in his life.  It is not always so easy to have unshakeable faith, all of one’s life, and I am sure that many of the great saints felt invaded by doubts from time to time, especially when they were undergoing some very severe testing periods.  But, look into the eyes of an innocent child and see there the faith he, or she has, knowing that they are safe in your hands, safe and loved so that no harm will come to them.  That look cannot be bought – it is so precious – but it mirrors, in some respects, the faith some of us can have in God and his goodness.  Observe the faith that Father Ambrose had when nearing his death, in June of this year.  He had known for some months that he was dying, but this he was prepared to face, with great love and cheerfulness, secure in the faith that he had loved God all his life and had always tried to do God’s will, to the best of his ability. 

I suppose it is not possible for all of us to have perfect faith, but faith is a gift from God, and the imperfections may to a large extent be due to the way in which we receive and handle that gift.  How wonderful it is then to see something approaching perfect faith in the words of St. Teresa of Avila:

So, what is faith?  The poet, William Wordsworth, must have been pondering the same question when, in 1850, he wrote a short poem entitled, “On the Banks of a Rocky Stream”.  His words are quite the opposite of those used by St. Teresa.  They speak of ‘eddies’ and ‘whirlpools’ not to mention ‘disquietude’, and then, lo and behold, he goes to God for help: 

On the Banks of a Rocky Stream

(Published 1850)  

Behold an emblem of our human mind

Crowded with thoughts that need a settled home,

Yet, like to eddying balls of foam

Within this whirlpool, they each other chase

Round and round, and neither find

An outlet nor a resting-place!

Stranger, if such disquietude be thine,

Fall on thy knees and sue for help divine. 

William Wordsworth 

Faith, in the ordinary sense, is all to do with trust and belief in someone, or something, to the effect that that placement of belief will prove to be true and well-founded, now, or at some time in the future.  It is very closely connected with that other virtue, called ‘hope’, because, in placing one’s faith and trust in that someone, or something, one very much ‘hopes’ that the trust has not been misplaced, as a misplacement would, inevitably, lead to a betrayal of that trust.  In entrusting one’s faith, there is no requirement for proof, in the first instance; indeed, it is most often the case that, it is in the absence of proof, that faith in that someone, or something, and in the expected outcome, is called forward.  Faith is most often called for, and resorted to, in terms of religious beliefs.  In this sense, faith is almost invariably taken to mean trust (belief) in the existence of a Supreme Being, or Deity – a transcendent reality – though it is also applied, very often, to a set of religious teachings – and to articles which form the very basic principles of a person’s religious make-up.  In this religious sense, faith is far beyond that range of normal physical activities in which proof can be used – in a realm that is off-limits to material measurement and the rigors of all scientific enquiry.

In all the monotheistic religions that I can bring to mind, the most important common factor concerns faith in the existence of one Supreme Being – an all-powerful deity, we Christians call God – though there are alternatives allied to other religions.

Leaving aside other faiths, faith, in Christianity, is based in, and on, the words of the Bible, and the work and teachings of Jesus, himself.  It is a supernatural gift that enables us to believe, first, that there is One God, the Father of us all, an all-powerful and loving Creator, who made all things in heaven and on earth, all things visible and invisible.  It tells us that God made man in his own image and likeness, to love him and serve him in our lives upon earth, and then to be happy with him forever in heaven, after we have died.  The gift of faith has its origin in God, and is dynamic in its essence.  This means that those who receive it – and accept its reality – begin to understand the mystery of God and his grace – then go on and seek to learn more, to become obedient to him and his will, thus growing in his grace and favour.  Secondly, faith leads us to believe in the ‘fall’ of mankind because of our first parents’ Original Sin, and then God’s love and redemption of the human race, through the gift of his Son, Jesus, who was born on earth as a man, lived, suffered grievously and died in expiation of Adam’s sin.  Jesus, the ‘Second Adam’ rose ‘from the dead’, and in so doing, he gives us our ‘resurrection’ to new life, and saves us from the perils of an everlasting enmity with God. 

Faith, an ‘allegory’ by the Spanish sculptor Luis S. Carmona (1752 – 53)

(The veil symbolizes the impossibility of knowing sacred evidence directly)

None of this is capable of proof by physical means, and, without faith, one would be right to dismiss it ‘out of hand’, or otherwise be deemed a ‘nutter’ – and rightly so!  To illustrate, I can picture in my mind an alien from Planet Sentaur, landing on earth, then to be told about God – his power, and place, way above everything alive and dead – then about Jesus and his saving power.  I can see the alien, sans trust, sans faith, sans all credibility, beginning to ‘double up’ with laughter at our total naivety.  I can see him turn, and walk back to his space-craft, muttering to himself: “Come on; we want no more of this kind of rubbish.  If they’re all like this, here on this planet, then let’s be off.  Let’s get back to some sanity on Sentaur, (or wherever!).

However, on the positive side, some philosophers have defended the gift, and use, of ‘Faith’, claiming that life is ‘well nigh’ impossible without it.  Most of these people have held that life, as we know it, is so full of evidence gaps, all of them requiring some leap of faith in order to carry on, in any normal way, that such beliefs, without proof, should, and must, be accepted.  William James, an American philosopher, (1842 – 1910), held that any belief that assists in an individual’s functionality is a good thing, per se, and should not be dismissed, even if what was required to be proved cannot be proven.  So much for ‘Quad erat demonstrandum’, (that which was required to be proved)!

For my own part, I do not pretend to be a philosopher (except, perhaps, one of the ‘home-spun’ variety), and I am certainly not from Sentaur (or so my faith would have me believe), and, therefore, according to the definitions of some, they might well call me a ‘nutter’.  Be that as it may, the following few lines of my own blank verse, may help to illustrate my deeply-held feelings on this subject, and, at the same time, serve to underline all that has gone before:

“… … The answer lies in our lack of Faith, Hope,

And wavering Trust in the Word of God,

For we are human, after all, and doubt

Magnifies our imperfections.   The time

Is now, my friend, to mend our ways, …. believe

With all that strength of mind, and heart, and soul,

In God, His Word and promise of support,

Even unto the end of time, on earth,

And into Paradise.” 

Socius

In e-mailing the blog, ‘Word Press’ tends to distort the original formatting of the document.  Readers may wish to visit the website www.stmarysblog.co.uk to read it in its original format.

People Who Leave a Lasting Impression:

It is a rather strange phenomenon, that often, when a person dies, we see them in a ‘different light’ than when they were alive. I well remember a parishioner, who looked after her mother when her mother lived just across the road, from her. In her old age, the mother was very demanding, and three to four times each day, her daughter would cross the street to tend to her mother. It was a seemingly caring ‘chore’ until the old lady died. The daughter then felt ‘lost’, without her constant caring for her mother, a mother she valued so much more. Time passes, and we can then look, quite realistically, at our past experiences, but it remains true to say, that when a person dies, often we see them in a different light; in my experience, it is then a ‘better, warmer and often more appreciative light’, than when they were alive, though there is no ‘hard and fast’ rule to this.

Martin Kevill

Very recently, I officiated at the funeral of a local man – not strictly speaking a parishioner – but one who often came to Church here. His name was Martin Kevill, who for years, lived at Bradwell Farm, Croston, where he became a successful business man. He was ever unconventional in his life-style; his attitude to things, his attitude to people, in his whole being, he refused to ‘conform’. Even in his clothes, he dressed without concern for looking ‘smart’, and although he came from the best of Lancashire’s ‘social circles’, he was most ‘at home’ with those who, we might say, were the lesser important people, in the eyes of the world. He would challenge all, from the top, to the bottom of society, by what he believed and what he talked about; in this, he was never afraid to let others know his own opinions, on important matters, e.g. faith, or moral issues. He wrote a short autobiography called, “The Haunted Man”, and its title provides an insight into the author, himself.

As a priest, one is privileged to preside at the funeral of a person, who has, so recently, left this world behind; in this, it is very helpful to get to know something about the deceased. In the planning, I was not meant to be the priest-in-charge at Martin’s funeral, as he had arranged the whole etiquette some years ago, with Fr. Ambrose. However, Fr. Ambrose died in June of this year – pre-deceasing Martin by about three months. I did get to know Martin, to some extent, personally, and had met various members of his family – nephews, his brother Roger Kevill, who lived in Bamber Bridge, when I was there as a curate. However, Martin’s health had, more latterly, deteriorated and the last period of his life was spent, very happily, with the Augustinian Sisters, at Boarbank Hall. In fact, his last trip from the Hall was when he attended the funeral of Fr. Ambrose, 30th June 2011, in our Church. Once that quite beautiful ceremony was ended, Martin asked me to preside at his funeral Mass; he then told me, what I already knew, as Fr. Ambrose, when dying, had also suggested that I should take care of Martin’s funeral. I will never forget the goodness and charity, embodied in his personal request to me, at the same time, placing in me his complete trust; I was also struck by his ‘matter-of-fact’ manner, and the frank way in which he talked about it. It was also on this occasion that I met with Tony Calderbank, a friend of Martin’s for 40 years, and with whom he had discussed, in detail, all these funeral arrangements, and with whom, I should be in touch when ‘anything happened’.

 Before the funeral, I had the opportunity to meet with Martin’s niece, with Tony Calderbank and his wife, Margaret, from Chorley. By this time, I felt then I had got to ‘know’ Martin, much better than in the past, and after my fairly brief encounters with him. It was only after he had died that I began to realise why he had never married – a realisation that he was immensely shy. I also came to understood, on reading his very brief auto-biography, why he was such a ‘philanthropic man’, loving all those in need, especially the poor. At heart, he was deeply religious, having been ‘reared’ in a devout and well-to-do Lancashire family; from his childhood, his mother helped him to respect and understand the people of Lisieux Hall – those with ‘learning difficulties’ he’d encountered as a young boy; she taught him that each one of those people were brothers to be loved and cherished. This is how he put it:

“When I was younger, in the early 1930’s, we were taken for a walk every Sunday afternoon through the delightful village of Whittle-le-Woods, near Chorley, and into the Whittle hills. The walk always seemed to coincide with a large group, walking in ‘crocodile fashion’ from Lisieux Hall, the home for physically and mentally disabled men, run by the Brothers of Charity. I was only four and a half years old, but I used to ask my mother: “Why do they seem different to other people?”

She replied: “They are not as lucky as you are; they have been left with great difficulties of mind and body.” She went on to describe what a ‘straight-jacket’ was, before explaining that they lived in a ‘perpetual straight-jacket’ throughout the whole of their lives. My mother was strong on the point, that we must always be kind and generous to them, as they would always be dependent on other people to look after them – carers to help them throughout their lives. Without this help, she said, they would lead very unhappy and sad lives.

“She taught me never to be unkind to them, and always to help them, whenever possible. In the eyes of God, she said, they were, probably, much more highly thought of than we were. She told me never to laugh at them, as their ‘condition was through no fault of theirs, and, in any event she warned, one never knew, in life, what could happen, at any time. A sports injury, a car accident, brain damage, or a stroke, as one gets older, could leave a person finding out, late in life, what these residents from Lisieux Hall, have endured throughout the whole of their lives; it also may well leave one with the feeling that one might wish one had helped them whilst one were able.”

Martin learned to call this group ‘people with learning difficulties’, because, at that time, the name had more dignity attached to it. He also discovered that, in the world at large, there are about 250 million such people, and it was here that I discovered why he called himself, ‘a haunted man’; it was because the ‘sadness’ of some such people, together with ‘others in need’ haunted him all his life. I believe the root of this was because of his own ability to ‘identify’ with the ‘simple’ and ‘uncomplicated’ needs of such people. His own personal shyness, probably, assisted him in this, as did his clear belief in God, who taught us, through Jesus, that whatever we do to the least of our brothers, or sisters, we do to Jesus, himself.

However, Martin was, certainly, no conventional saint. In his unconventional ‘other’ direction, he loved a good and long drink; he loved to go into the pub and have a ‘skin-full’ and he loved’ generously’ helping people. He had his own self-discipline, however, never drinking on his own, but only in the company of others.

After his schooling, which took him to Ampleforth College, Martin joined the Welsh Guards, in 1944. He was in Northern Germany, after Peace was declared in 1945, and had some ‘strong’ experiences seeing mentally, and physically-handicapped children, saved by peace, from the ‘gas chambers’ of the Belsen Concentration Camp. Around the time, he also almost accidentally lost his life, in Gdansk, and, in regard to this, he wrote: “Many of us were thrown into the water when the quayside gave way and I was knocked on the back by a piece of concrete, which knocked me unconscious. Apparently, a Russian sailor fished me out and, presumably, saved my life. I would have loved to have met him”. When he arrived home, in Britain, the prognosis was paralysis of the legs, for life. One day he was feeling ‘very low’, and one of the gentlest monks of our Abbey, Fr. Gerard Sitwell, went to visit him in the Wheatly Hospital, Oxford – a hospital for head and spinal injuries. Martin ‘blurted out’ to Fr. Gerard: “Father I will try my vocation, as a Benedictine monk, if I regain the use of my legs”. He continues his story: “As luck would have it, there was a famous neuro-surgeon, Sir Hugh Cairns, a brilliant Scotsman, and he operated on me; it was a dangerous operation on my central-nervous system; after the operation, though ‘cast’ in a ‘plaster jacket’, I began to get the use back into my legs, and eventually, I made a substantial recovery”. Martin then entered Ampleforth Abbey, in 1948, and remained there for 14 months; his fellow novice, Fr. Nicholas Walford, remained his friend, and used to come and visit him, right to the end of his life. It was Abbot Herbert Byrne, who told Martin, after the recurrence of a nervous complaint, that ‘he had served his contract with God’, and who said to Martin: “You may leave the monastery. God bless!” That was in 1950.

Martin tried to share his ideas, and ideals, in imaginative ways. He built his own ‘millennium dome’ which had both the ‘Beatitudes’ and the ‘Ten Commandments’ displayed on it, as well as the contrast between the very rich, and the very poor, of the world. I remember, he showed me Bill Gates (of ‘Microsoft’ fame), who had a personal wealth, way in excess of the whole annual budget of many poor countries, in our world. He gave away his farm, and his money – almost a half-million pounds – then teaming up with the ‘Sons of Divine Providence’, to live in a caravan, at the back of his property, surrounded by a huge number of Garden Gnomes. He remained loyal to the British Legion, to the Welsh Guards, to his Benedictine background and to his love for his country. He had a very strong love of Our Lady, and I have memories of him coming to Mass, at 12.15, in St. Mary’s, Leyland – always late, and always with a huge rosary in his hands. Georgie, his niece, told me he was late, because he was so shy! Tony Calderbank said to me, he was quite liable to urge himself, and his friend, to go to Confession on a Saturday evening, at Brownedge Church, and then, afterwards, think it a good idea, to go for a ‘couple of pints’ in the local pub.

 Everyone I spoke with, about Martin, while preparing his funeral service, had felt ‘touched’ by Martin’s goodness. He was buried on the feast of Our Lady of Walsingham – the ‘English Mary’ – so to speak, which was a sure sign, and blessing from heaven, as is also the fact that this blog, will appear on the 13th October – a special day for Our Lady of Fatima. In the papers left for his funeral, and amid all his goodness, there was a marvellous statement of his faith, despite a lingering sense of doubt. Regarding this last comment, one can ask how many great ‘believing’ people have also felt God to be a bit remote! It is worth quoting Martin in full, to end this short, and authentic, piece of writing.

  • How I envy those who know without doubt that there is somebody called ‘God’ who lives in Heaven and can make them feel secure.
  • From the earliest possible age, I was taught there was a friend for little children who would send me to hell if I did not behave.
  • Later I read the Bible went to Church and listened to the knowledgeable – and now as an old man I still read the Bible, go to Church and listen to the knowledgeable.
  • Sadly, I’m further from understanding any of it than when I was a child, when, I truly believed there was someone called God, who lived in Heaven and makes me a good person, Amen.
  • I shall go on trying to understand and maybe all will be revealed. But time is drawing short. My only hope is that if there is a God living up there in Heaven – He’ll understand that at least I tried.
  • PS. The recent Easter Journal 2006 – Sons of Divine Providence helps me greatly. Pope Benedict says, ‘immersed like everyone else in the dramatic complexity of historical events, Christians remain unshakeably certain that God is our Father and loves us, even when his SILENCE remains INCOMPREHENSIBLE.

I never knew what devotion he might arouse in others, like the two middle-aged ‘bikers’ who came to his funeral, and who had been Welsh Guardsmen in the Falkland’s War. I never knew of his utter commitment to serving, and helping others, when he, himself, felt doubts as outlined above. But, I got to know, after his death, and, as I reflected on my own experiences, with him, and heard others, I realised that here was a man who truly loved his brothers, and sisters, with the kind of love God has for us, and who, consequently, got to know God himself.

 As for me, I will side with Martin Kevill, as he sides with Pope Benedict.

To access the blog with its original formatting, you may wish to go to www.stmarysblog.co.uk/main/